Bliley RJReynolds
Redacted Material - (P.8903) Portion of Report, Prepared by RJR Managerial Employee Which Reflects the Substance of Confidential Attorney-Client Communications Between M Crohn (RJR in-House Legal Counsel) and RJR Personnel Concerning Smoking and Health Matters, and (Pp.8916-8923) Concerning Regulatory, Legislative and Public Relations Matters.
Fields
- Author
- Rjr
Document Images
SOSAS
REVIEW
February i0, 1978

SOSAS REVIEW o-.-.
~ " " AGENDA
"February 10, 1978 -
"
Appendix. .
I. Introduction and Background
IIo Califano Issue D. ~urden
A. Appraisal of Where We Are
o B. Strategy
C. Governor'.s Meeting
• ..
(Hunt Position Paper}
"
IIIo ACS N~tlonal Commission on F.H." Christopher, Jr.
Smoking and Public Pollcy
• Update
IV. Nonsmoker Forum M.H. Crohn, Jr°
• . Ao The Issue
B. Industry Response
-
• Alternatlves
(German symposium) "
'" ~
• Witnesses
.
V. Publlc Relations Update" R. Sustana.
..
VI. Public Affairs ~pdate D. Durden
-.--.
VII. Advertising Strategy T. D~llon
"
and Alternatives D. McLo.ughlin
VIII Next Steps and Timetable J.R. Peterson
~

---

SOSAS REVIEW
February 10, 1978
The last time we met, we reviewed an updated Charter for this
work. -The first three paragraphs of this Charter are worth reviewing
to focus in on the work that is being carried out:
SOSAS is a feasibility study of a long-term, inten-
Sive, nationwide effort by the.Tobacco Indust~v
pointed at the closely related issues of passive
smoking, restrictions on smokers, and the social
acceptability of smoking and smokers.
Its purpose is to determine what programs, if any,
should be implemented to educate, communicate, and
mobilize support on behalf of smokers, smoking, and
the entire tobacco conmlunity. It is designed to
proclaim the truth about the rights of smokers and
nonsmokers alike.
Overall, it is intended to reassert the Tobacco
Industry's position and its public credibility as
it relates to the Issues of social acceptability.
In other words, it is the charge to this group to carry out an
exhaustive study of what can be done to turn.the tide of public opinion
that has built up over the past 20 to 25 years. We are In the process
of searching out viable programs through the avenues of:
- Direct consumer con~nunlcation
- Public Relations
and
- Public Affairs
Because of the preponderance of public opinion, which is negative
to the Industry, there is great do~vnside rlsk connected with any program
that we identify and develop but the future of the Industry warrant~
the effort.

SOSAS REVIEW -
February I0, 1978
Page 2
tte will be covering a number of key elements of this work this
morning.
CONFIDENTIAL AND/OB PRIVILEGEI~
• FOBMATIDN HAS BEEN ~E[.ETEP
Before we turn to the agenda, ] would like to touch on what has
been accomplished in the eight months since this group was formed
and started this effort.
In net, through the work of SOSAS, the Industry is unified and
is moving far more a~.ressivel_~_, under RJR's leadership. If nothing
more comes from this work, the benefit would be well worth the
effort.
Some of the progress resulting from this effort can be summed up
in the following points:
" Clearer understanding of the problems confronting the
Industry and an appreciation of the consequences.
• Unity of the Industry,
• Reorganization of T.I. and Programing. Broadened focus of
work and moved to a more aggressive posture.
• T.A.N,
• ICOSl
° Recognition of possible role of Brand Advertising.
Development of data bank on economic impact of industry
by Congressional District. This is basically a lobbying
tool, but a powerful one.
• Recognition of non-smoker issue and program development.
• Effective program to deal with Califano Program.
• Effective program to deal with ACS Target 5 Program.

SOSAS REVIEW
February ]0,
Page 3
In review, we have moved from a planning and learning mode to
one of action -- not action for action's sake, but action that is
based on strategies that are well thought out and carefully considered
in terms of negative or dovmside effects, as well as upside potential.
The agenda for todaY's meeting deals with two basic issues:
- The Califano Program
- The Non-Smoker Issues
Dennis will start out with a report on the Califano issue.

• S06~ OCOOS

28 JAT(LL~J~Y 1978
DURDEN
SLIDE 4
SOSAS REVIEW ~EETII~G OF FEBRUARY I0, 1978
SU~;~J~RY OF RJR AND I~DUSTRY INITIATIVES
(~CO~,'PLE'[ED _AN[).PROPOSED) IN THE CALIFANO AFFAIR
* T.I.'S PRE-EMPTIVE STRIKE
* T.I.'S SYSTEMATIC FO{LO-W-UPS 0,~ CALIFARO OUTREACH
* T.I. 'S "FAMILY" ADS
* RJR'S CORPORATE-WIDE GRASSROOTS MAIL PROGRAM
* V#~IL FROM FRIEI~DS OF THE COMPANY AND INDUSTRY
* RJR'S Q. & A. SHEET
* RJR'S BACKGROUI~D PAPER FOR TOBACCO-STATE GOVERNORS
* RJRT'S TOP ~tANAGE!,IENT LETTERS TO REGIONAL PAPERS AND
SYt~DICATED COLUI.I;II STS
* RJR'S BRIEFING PAPER FOR COLIN STOKES' MEETING WITH CALIFANO
* RJR'S FOLLOW-UP BRIEFING PAPERS FOR:
* TOBACCO 1RADE
* FAPJ4ER CO~UNITY
* FI~ANCIAL COI,~IU~ITY
* RJR'S SPECIAL INITIATIVES WITH STATE AGRICULTURAL SECRETARIES
* OTHER ACTIVITIES

28 J/V~UARY 1978
DUP, DEfI
SLIDE 5
• "" SOSAS REVIEW ~EETING OF FEBRU~RY I0, 1978
KEY ISSUES HIGHLIGH'~ED B._~_Y CAL~IFAI~O'S ACTIONS
~ARNII~G LABELS
EXCISE IAX ]HCREASES
uON,INuAT,ON
TOBACCO SUPPORT PROGP,~I ....
S~KII~G EDUCATIO~ PROGP, AMS
GROWING EI~PHASIS ON SOCIAL COSTS THRUSTS
RESPONSE OF OTHER CO~4PANIES TO CALIFANO
POL]IICAL IMPACTS OF A DECLINING ~RKET
A I~EW SURGEOI~ GENERAL'S REPORT

TTT XTDU~eT~
